Peer Review Process

IJS: International Journal of Social Humanities implements a peer-reviewed system peer review Strict, objective, and transparent review to ensure the scientific quality of each published article. The review process is carried out using the peer-reviewed method.double-blind review, where the identities of authors and reviewers are kept confidential to maintain the independence and objectivity of the assessment. Each manuscript will go through several stages of selection before being decided for publication.

IJS Peer Review Process Stages Table

No	Stages	Description
1	Submission	Authors submit manuscripts through the journal's OJS system.
2	Initial Screening	The editor checks the suitability of the topic, format, and completeness of the manuscript.
3	Plagiarism Check	Checking the level of similarity using plagiarism detection software
4	Desk Evaluation	Editors assess the initial suitability (relevance, novelty, scientific contribution)
5	Reviewer Assignment	Manuscripts are sent to at least 2 reviewers according to their field of expertise.
6	Double-Blind Review	Reviewers evaluate the methodology, analysis, and quality of the substance.
7	Review Recommendation	Reviewers provide recommendations (accept, revise, reject)
8	Author Revision	The author makes revisions according to the reviewer's input.
9	Final Decision	The editor makes the final decision based on the review results.
10	Copyediting & Proofreading	Language and format editing before publication
11	Publication	Articles are published online in the journal

Explanation

The peer review process at IJS: International Journal of Social Humanities begins with the submission of a manuscript through the OJS system. The editor first conducts...initial screening to ensure that the manuscript aligns with the journal's focus and scope and meets writing standards. Furthermore, a plagiarism check is performed to ensure the originality of the scientific work.

Manuscripts that pass the initial stage will go through desk evaluation to assess the scientific contribution and novelty of the research. If deemed suitable, the manuscript will be sent to at least two reviewers who have the appropriate competencies in the field of study. In the review process double-blind review, reviewers evaluate the quality of the methodology, depth of analysis, and relevance of research findings.

The reviewers then provide a recommendation of acceptance, minor revisions, major revisions, or rejection. The author is given the opportunity to revise the manuscript based on the feedback provided. Once the revision process is complete, the editor will make the final decision regarding the article's acceptance.

The final stage includes copyediting and proofreading to ensure language quality and formatting consistency before articles are published. Through this process, IJS ensures that every published article has undergone rigorous, objective, and high-quality scientific selection, and is capable of making a significant contribution to the development of the social sciences and humanities.